Raiders Seeking Trading Parter for Seventh Overall Pick and Players

[yayarea_raider]

It's no secret that the Raiders only have five picks in the NFL draft. They have a pick in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 7th rounds. It's no surprise that they could be looking to acquire more picks via trade down, or by trading one of their players...

http://yayarearaider.blogspot.com/

[Big Game Geoff]

I don't see us doin it unless we trade a player for a pick(s)...

[Don]

Watch out for running storys off of a source like that, AJ. Raiderbeat is always cooking spaghetti, and it dont always stick. Plus theres a huge diff between "seeking" and "could be seeking"..

Hopefully this scenario unfolds if we can't get the guy we want at #7. If we were going to move Burgess in a contract year, thats just stupid, we should have done it last year

[iceman4444]

http://yayarearaider.blogspot.com/

Every year we hear how they are trading down;

The Raiders have not traded down in 48 years; dont hold your breath. Rumors only.

[yayarea_raider]

Watch out for running storys off of a source like that, AJ. Raiderbeat is always cooking spaghetti, and it dont always stick. Plus theres a huge diff between "seeking" and "could be seeking"..

Hopefully this scenario unfolds if we can't get the guy we want at #7. If we were going to move Burgess in a contract year, thats just stupid, we should have done it last year

Raiderbeat has been right on what they've been cooking Don. Plus, it came from a Raider official.

Every year we hear how they are trading down;

The Raiders have not traded down in 48 years; dont hold your breath. Rumors only.

You know they probably won't trade down, but I'm just posting what's out there dude. And it's not so much a rumor i it's coming from a Raider official.

[GenRaider]

The Raiders do not trade down in round one.

[raiderdude69]

That Raiderbeatoff site is run by a bunch of wannabe hacks.. Might as well be reading the National Inquirer.. Seriously..

[Tió Nook Nook]

here's a chart (albeit a fucked up one. couldn't copy/paste the rows and columns properly) that shows how many times teams have traded up or down in the draft.
Oakland has traded up 6 times, and down once in the last 5 yrs.


Team Traded Up Traded Down Total Trades
Dallas 6 12 18
Green Bay 5 12 17
Philadelphia 7 7 14
Jacksonville 7 6 13
Cleveland 9 3 12
Detroit 9 3 12
Minnesota 6 5 11
Baltimore 6 5 11
New England 3 8 11
San Fran. 4 5 9
New Orleans 4 5 9
N.Y. Jets 5 4 9
Oakland 6 1 7
St. Louis 5 2 7
Indianapolis 3 3 6
Miami 3 3 6
Atlanta 4 2 6
Washington 2 4 6
Tampa Bay 1 5 6
Carolina 3 2 5
Pittsburgh 3 2 5
Seattle 3 2 5
Houston 1 4 5
Tennessee 1 4 5
Denver 3 1 4
N.Y. Giants 3 1 4
San Diego 2 2 4
Kansas City 1 3 4
Buffalo 3 0 3
Chicago 0 3 3
Arizona 1 0 1
Cincinnati 0 1 1

[yayarea_raider]

That Raiderbeatoff site is run by a bunch of wannabe hacks.. Might as well be reading the National Inquirer.. Seriously..

You know they've been pretty accurate though. That's good enough for me.

[el boracho]

wouldnt mind it but i doubt it goes down....

[or24]

here's a chart (albeit a fucked up one. couldn't copy/paste the rows and columns properly) that shows how many times teams have traded up or down in the draft.
Oakland has traded up 6 times, and down once in the last 5 yrs.


Team Traded Up Traded Down Total Trades
Dallas 6 12 18
Green Bay 5 12 17
Philadelphia 7 7 14
Jacksonville 7 6 13
Cleveland 9 3 12
Detroit 9 3 12
Minnesota 6 5 11
Baltimore 6 5 11
New England 3 8 11
San Fran. 4 5 9
New Orleans 4 5 9
N.Y. Jets 5 4 9
Oakland 6 1 7
St. Louis 5 2 7
Indianapolis 3 3 6
Miami 3 3 6
Atlanta 4 2 6
Washington 2 4 6
Tampa Bay 1 5 6
Carolina 3 2 5
Pittsburgh 3 2 5
Seattle 3 2 5
Houston 1 4 5
Tennessee 1 4 5
Denver 3 1 4
N.Y. Giants 3 1 4
San Diego 2 2 4
Kansas City 1 3 4
Buffalo 3 0 3
Chicago 0 3 3
Arizona 1 0 1
Cincinnati 0 1 1
looks like if anything its up not down...good stats :roc:

[raiderdude69]

You know they've been pretty accurate though. That's good enough for me.

Accurate on what exactly? Everything on there is the same shit I could find on any other site on the 'net, other than that Paul Wexler's wacked out opinions.. I started checking that place out right when it started, thinking the dude might have some inside scoop on some shit, but I've been thoroughly unimpressed.. And his complete hatred for JaMarcus is utterly astounding.. Fuck that dude and their entire site.. Sorry, just my humble opinion, but that's all that matters to me anyway..

[David]

Accurate on what exactly? Everything on there is the same shit I could find on any other site on the 'net, other than that Paul Wexler's wacked out opinions.. I started checking that place out right when it started, thinking the dude might have some inside scoop on some shit, but I've been thoroughly unimpressed.. And his complete hatred for JaMarcus is utterly astounding.. Fuck that dude and their entire site.. Sorry, just my humble opinion, but that's all that matters to me anyway..

i agree that site isnt that great. Only thing they have gotten right was that they were one of the first sites to post that Nnamdi got signed.... If there is news, you will see it with David White at sfgate.