View Full Version : Bruce Expects to START
David
09-19-2010, 06:09 PM
http://www.nfl.com/videos/oakland-raiders/09000d5d81aab8a9/Raiders-postgame-press-conference
GET OVAHH IT!!!
That's good to expect things... I expect to get my dick sucked by Jessica Alba too
David
09-19-2010, 06:14 PM
That's good to expect things... I expect to get my dick sucked by Jessica Alba too
do u deserve it like bruce?
Miklo
09-19-2010, 06:16 PM
do u deserve it like bruce?
What has Bruce done to deserve a blowjob from Jessica Alba?
David
09-19-2010, 06:36 PM
What has Bruce done to deserve a blowjob from Jessica Alba?
he won a game that with jason cambell at qb we would have neveer won...
Lil Joker
09-19-2010, 06:47 PM
he won a game that with jason cambell at qb we would have neveer won...
Woo he beat the lowly Rams....can we see what he does against decent competition?
Miklo
09-19-2010, 06:47 PM
he won a game that with jason cambell at qb we would have neveer won...
A) Are you psychic?
B) Barely beating the Rams in no way warrants getting a BJ from Jessica Alba.
Big Game Geoff
09-19-2010, 06:57 PM
Candle will get the start. Ioi...
David
09-19-2010, 07:15 PM
A) Are you psychic?
B) Barely beating the Rams in no way warrants getting a BJ from Jessica Alba.
A ) it doesnt take a psychic to know cambell was not going to do SHIT in back of that line.
B ) it doesnt matter who he beat, if he gives the best chance to win UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES why not start him??
Miklo
09-19-2010, 07:41 PM
Oh nevermind.
Tre 6 Months
09-19-2010, 08:41 PM
we definitely lose to AZ this Sunday if Bruce doesn't start. Campbell is rattled, as usual. The guy has no grit, no fire. The team responds to Bruce. They seem to prefer him, & the way the team interacts with Bruce, it's apparent that Bruce should be the unquestioned starter for this team.
To Campbell's defense tho, his skill set doesn't fit our shit ass O-line. It's not all his fault.
Was Veldheer at LT the whole first half? Or only a few plays?
Tre 6 Months
09-19-2010, 09:45 PM
Was Veldheer at LT the whole first half? Or only a few plays?
we shuffled the LT's so much in that game. 5 different times, 3 different players. Henderson started, then Veldheer came in, then Barnes, then Veldheer, then Henderson again. shit was comical at best; and Veldheer isn't ready to play anywhere on that iine. He's terrible. I thought Langston Walker played great today.
el boracho
09-19-2010, 09:52 PM
we shuffled the LT's so much in that game. 5 different times, 3 different players. Henderson started, then Veldheer came in, then Barnes, then Veldheer, then Henderson again. shit was comical at best; and Veldheer isn't ready to play anywhere on that iine. He's terrible. I thought Langston Walker played great today.
the rotating turnstiles were indeed comical.
Tre 6 Months
09-19-2010, 10:01 PM
I think maybe we disrespected the Rams, & our coaching staff actually tried out what they've been trying to figure out during an actual game. lol Think about it, subbed in a new QB, moved the O-line around all game long, suddenly things were working. What better way to find out what works than in a live game? kinda crazy, but I think we did that
BigPrimo
09-19-2010, 10:32 PM
I think maybe we disrespected the Rams, & our coaching staff actually tried out what they've been trying to figure out during an actual game. lol Think about it, subbed in a new QB, moved the O-line around all game long, suddenly things were working. What better way to find out what works than in a live game? kinda crazy, but I think we did that
I agree, I also think Cable might have had a fuck Al moment and was going to play who he wanted to.
el boracho
09-19-2010, 11:40 PM
what really stood out to me was the change of play calling in the second half. It seemed to me like someone on the coaching staff made the proper adjustments and that was the turning point in the game. Those quick passes that started the first drive with Bruce really set the table and put the offense in a decent rythm. Bruce just fits the offense better with this offensive line.
BigPrimo
09-19-2010, 11:56 PM
Maybe they locked Al in an electric closet? Maybe he is still there?
Doyers y Esleigher
09-20-2010, 01:57 AM
I think Campbell is best as a pocket passer and our offensive line can't handle that. I don't think this is damning of him so much as it is good on Bruce. This was also the Rams and they still might have lost if not for a BS penalty, so I dunno how excited I am about Bruce against good teams.
Campbell has sucked, period. If we don't start Bruce I'll probably only watch 1 drive next week.
iceman4444
09-20-2010, 02:07 AM
http://www.nfl.com/videos/oakland-raiders/09000d5d81aab8a9/Raiders-postgame-press-conference
GET OVAHH IT!!!
This guy reminds me of Jeff Garcia and Rich Gannon; both were pegged as backups for years and teams were reluctant to give them chances.
Like I said before the season started; Campbell is NOT a good QB. Shanahan's first decision was to get a new QB.
Gradkowski doesn't have a strong arm and in todays Mel Kiper world, you are deemed not good enough if you cant' throw seventy yards.
I said in my preview; if the RAiders want to be a .500 team, Gradkowski is their best bet at QB. The team and the fans respond to him. Campbell isn't a leader and he inspires people to take a nap. A good hard working guy, but he should be a backup.
This guy reminds me of Jeff Garcia and Rich Gannon; both were pegged as backups for years and teams were reluctant to give them chances.
Like I said before the season started; Campbell is NOT a good QB. Shanahan's first decision was to get a new QB.
Gradkowski doesn't have a strong arm and in todays Mel Kiper world, you are deemed not good enough if you cant' throw seventy yards.
I said in my preview; if the RAiders want to be a .500 team, Gradkowski is their best bet at QB. The team and the fans respond to him. Campbell isn't a leader and he inspires people to take a nap. A good hard working guy, but he should be a backup.
No teams were not reluctant to give Rich Gannon a chance... Rich Gannon had a few chances before he came to Oakland and he SUCKED...
Doyers y Esleigher
09-20-2010, 11:00 AM
No teams were not reluctant to give Rich Gannon a chance... Rich Gannon had a few chances before he came to Oakland and he SUCKED...
Teams were definitely reluctant to stick with him, and none of them ran the right system for a QB like Gannon.
That said, I do agree that Gannon is overrated. A lot of smart QB's with quick feet and weak arms would kill to have Tim Brown, Jerry Rice, Charlie Garner and Barrett Robbins around them.
Tre 6 Months
09-20-2010, 11:04 AM
No teams were not reluctant to give Rich Gannon a chance... Rich Gannon had a few chances before he came to Oakland and he SUCKED...
also note, that when Rich Gannon came to Oakland he inherited a potential powerhouse team. With the likes of Hall Of Famer WR Jerry Rice, future Hall of Famer Tim Brown, great Backs like Tyrone Wheatley, Charlie Garner, Zack Crockett, & Jon Richie. And a very solid Defense, which also had some Hall of Famers on it as well, like Rod Woodson ,Charles Woodson, who was great. Let's face it, while Rich Gannon was in Oakland, he was surrounded by great talent. We also had a competent coaching staff & a GM. Just sayin.......
He had a nice, set table indeed... and a good OL.. granted, I think Rich getting the ball out ASAP did make the OL look better as is the case with Grads...
Doyers y Esleigher
09-20-2010, 11:07 AM
Barrett Robbins was NFL MVP that year, it's just too bad he had to pull the "giveth... then taketh away" shit that year.
Sonny Cheeba
09-20-2010, 02:40 PM
Jacob Campsall is the startuh for TTOTD, he reminds me of that Plunkett fellah....the will to win is TFTBB within these walls....we have ALWAYS made great trades....(mouth pop).....GOI
"Herrera, give this statement to the PR Dept and uhhh(mouth pop).....make sure Tommy doesnt see it first."
Tre 6 Months
09-20-2010, 03:34 PM
"Herrera, give this statement to the PR Dept and uhhh(mouth pop).....make sure Tommy doesnt see it first."
that's actually how it goes in Alameda too, lol. Watch a few Tom Cable pressers. The media brings up statements made by "The Organization", & Tom Cable just pauses. Cable is told anything, he's the last to know. lol
el boracho
09-20-2010, 08:58 PM
Teams were definitely reluctant to stick with him, and none of them ran the right system for a QB like Gannon.
That said, I do agree that Gannon is overrated. A lot of smart QB's with quick feet and weak arms would kill to have Tim Brown, Jerry Rice, Charlie Garner and Barrett Robbins around them.
Yeah big Lincoln Kennedy and Frank Middleton were a big reason Gannon was so succesfull.
iceman4444
09-21-2010, 02:29 PM
Gradkowski can handle a rush; Campbell cant'. Campbell is not a good QB; I said it before and I'll say it again.
The only way he starts again is because Al doesn't want to admit he spent all that money on another bad decision. When has Campbell been good?
iceman4444
09-21-2010, 02:31 PM
He had a nice, set table indeed... and a good OL.. granted, I think Rich getting the ball out ASAP did make the OL look better as is the case with Grads...
You are right on with that; There are certain QB's that have a feel in the pocket.
Dan Marino couldn't outrun a dead dog but he would throw where he knew his WR would be, threw the ball away, and could feel a rush. Campbell doesn't have those skills.
If Gradkowski had a big arm he's be a star in this league; I still think he's deserves a shot. He's done nothing but prove himself.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.